<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The right to housing vs. the right to property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wagingnonviolence.org/2010/02/the-right-to-housing-vs-the-right-to-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wagingnonviolence.org/2010/02/the-right-to-housing-vs-the-right-to-property/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on the world of nonviolence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schneider</title>
		<link>http://wagingnonviolence.org/2010/02/the-right-to-housing-vs-the-right-to-property/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wagingnonviolence.org/?p=3498#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Great post! 

I think a big part of the problem is that many of those uninhabited places are so nice. Only the wealthy can afford to keep property vacant. And there&#039;s just such disgust at the idea that the homeless, of all people, could be allowed to live in ritzy places that they didn&#039;t &quot;earn.&quot; I think of that scene in &lt;em&gt;Dr. Zhivago&lt;/em&gt; when the aristocratic family comes home and finds their Moscow palace taken over by dirty working families—dozens of people living in a place once left nearly empty. But the scene is supposed to be disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! </p>
<p>I think a big part of the problem is that many of those uninhabited places are so nice. Only the wealthy can afford to keep property vacant. And there&#8217;s just such disgust at the idea that the homeless, of all people, could be allowed to live in ritzy places that they didn&#8217;t &#8220;earn.&#8221; I think of that scene in <em>Dr. Zhivago</em> when the aristocratic family comes home and finds their Moscow palace taken over by dirty working families—dozens of people living in a place once left nearly empty. But the scene is supposed to be disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
