The recent killing of at least nine activists aboard the Free Gaza boats by Israeli commandos and the international outcry that has followed have drawn unprecedented attention to the draconian blockade of Gaza. But will it lead to any tangible change in Israeli policy?
Government leaders around the world have strongly condemned the Israeli assault and are now openly calling for an end to blockade. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is also criticizing the current Israeli policy in no uncertain terms:
“The long-running closure imposed on the Gaza Strip is counter-productive, unsustainable and wrong. It punishes innocent civilians. It must be lifted by the Israeli authorities immediately.”
While these statements are no doubt important, the United States is the only country that can really impact the behavior of the Israeli government, and as Stephen Zunes notes, the Obama administration at first seemed to be siding with Israel:
…the White House issued a statement that simply “expressed deep regret at the loss of life in today’s incident, and concern for the wounded.” The White House did not criticize Israel’s actions. Meanwhile, the State Department appeared to condemn the multinational effort to deliver medical supplies and other humanitarian aid, saying that “”expanding the flow of goods to the people of Gaza…must be done in a spirit of cooperation, not confrontation.”
[…]
At the United Nations, the United States successfully blocked the Security Council from passing a resolution on the issue, accepting only an endorsement of a statement by the Security Council president, and then only after watering the statement down significantly.
An article in yesterday’s New York Times, however, said that the Obama administration does consider the current policy “untenable” and is planning on pushing Israel to change course:
“There is no question that we need a new approach to Gaza,” said one official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the policy shift is still in the early stages. He was reflecting a broadly held view in the upper reaches of the administration.
[…]
“Gaza has become the symbol in the Arab world of the Israeli treatment of Palestinians, and we have to change that,” the senior American official said. “We need to remove the impulse for the flotillas. The Israelis also realize this is not sustainable.”
Similarly, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently told reporters that the administration would be pressuring Israel to ease the blockade, which she called “unsustainable and unacceptable.”
While these are positive signs, words alone will not be enough. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is adamantly refusing to change course. Given this recalcitrance, the only way the US can push Israel on this issue is through the power of the purse.
If Congress doesn’t threaten to cut off the $3.2 billion in military aid to Israel that it is in the process of appropriating for next year, it’s hard to see any concrete change taking place as a result of this tragedy. And that still seems very unlikely.
The only way Congress would consider taking such a bold move is if the public does not let this issue die and there are sustained protest on a much larger scale than we have seen thus far. If you’re looking for a place to start, check out this list of actions.
Funny that all the focus in on legal and appropriate defensive measures Israel takes and not the casus beli.
Karine A in ’02…
MV Francop in ’09…
Yeah, there are UN Resolutions banning arms shipments to Hezbollah and Hamas, but that doesn’t seem to work does it.
The “activists” became combatants when they took up arms.
What would have happened during the Cuban missile crisis if a bunch of “Free Cuba” activists tried to run the blockade and resisted the USN? I’ll save you the trouble of actually having to use reason, the US Navy would have acted in the EXACT same manner and justly so.
If this was about peace, the aid ships would have entered Egyptian or Israeli ports so the aid could reach those who need it.
I think we need to look a little more deeply into the ‘politics’ of this region to see what is actually happening.
I believe that, to a certain extent, Israel taking over the coastal waters of Gaza is more complex that just Israel controlling what can enter Gaza. This is a bit of a smoke screen for what I believe to be the real reason. (See link below).
It is known that Hamas can get all the concrete it wants through the tunnels from Egypt and so could build the ‘bunkers’ it wants to use to send missiles in Israel. The only organisation that suffers from not getting concrete its the UN rebuiling programme.
I think this link explains what is really at the bottom of this situation:
http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?reference=6786&lg=en
I think we need to look a little more deeply into the ‘politics’ of this region to see what is actually happening.
I believe that, to a certain extent, Israel taking over the coastal waters of Gaza is more complex that just Israel controlling what can enter Gaza. This is a bit of a smoke screen for what I believe to be the real reason. (See link below).
It is known that Hamas can get all the concrete it wants through the tunnels from Egypt and so could build the ‘bunkers’ it wants to use to send missiles into Israel. The only organisation that suffers from not getting concrete is the UN rebuiling programme.
I think this link explains what is really at the bottom of this situation:
http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?reference=6786&lg=en
Grant, respectfully, that’s a conspiracy theory, not grounded in rational thought. The reasons for the blockade are really as simple as it seems. At least twice, ships laden with tons of munitions from Iran were seized trying to go to Gaza which precipitated the blockade. It is not a surprise that the rocket attacks have slowed down to non existent since the blockade has been in place.
International law on EEZs are pretty clear on who has rites to what off shore.
No need to look deep in politics when the politics are pretty darn clear…Hamas wants Israel to cease to exist.
Thanks for the tips. This is something I’m concerned about. The bad thing is this site doesn’t load fast on my ipod. I will see what we can do when I get home and will be back for more info.