It’s a thing. Parents are hosting protest parties instead of birthday parties. The kids design signs, hold a march with their friends, and do a demonstration for peace, love, kindness or whatever. It’s training in standing up and speaking out — two prized freedoms in the United States. And it gives kids an experience they’re going to need again and again, probably in situations that are far less fun.
Young people just a few years older than these kids are staging school walk-outs over the lack of gun control, the climate crisis, the overuse of standardized tests, racist police shootings and more. They’re holding occupations to overturn racist school policies. They’re taking a knee along with athlete Colin Kaepernick. They’re organizing to protect their friends who are undocumented students. To this generation, the ability to make change is a survival skill for a world in crisis. These are the life skills they’ll need to create a world that works for them — and everyone.
As grown-ups, we need these skills as much as they do. And, more importantly, we need to understand both the full collection of methods of taking action, and the strategy behind why and how they work. There are over 300 different methods of nonviolent action, including everything from boycotts and strikes to divestment and blockades. Some are acts of protest and persuasion. Others remove our cooperation and support from an injustice. Still, others give us ways to directly intervene in a problem, blocking it or disrupting the system that allows it to continue.
These are the tools of citizens. They are another form of checks-and-balance, one that allows citizens to stand up to government inaction or corruption, corporate destruction, or systems of violence and oppression. All over the world, people are putting these tools to work. As the editor of the weekly Nonviolence News, I see the inspiring stories in action all the time. Every story shows us how we, too, can take action to make change. Take the following stories from this week’s news, for example.
The floating house
In a highly creative act of protest, Extinction Rebellion activists floated a sinking house down the Thames River. The action, they stated, was in solidarity with all the people who are losing their homes to rising sea levels. The floating house was also a reminder that, while it may be easier to make a sign than an enormous float, the more creativity you use, the more headlines you grab.
The commuter rail eat-in
After a commuter rail rider was detained for eating a sandwich on a BART station platform, riders held an eat-in protest. They brought their lunches and ate on the platform, defying the rules to put out its injustice. This is an example of mass non-compliance with a law to make it unenforceable and challenge both its legitimacy and its selective enforcement.
The libraries boycott
Objecting to inflated ebook prices and unfair practices, libraries across the country have decided to boycott two ebook publishers whose policies unfairly cost libraries high prices. Boycotts are a powerful form of action that can be organized by consumers, suppliers, industries, shipping companies, and more.
Platform power
Soccer star Megan Rapinoe was given the “Woman of the Year Award”. She used her podium and platform to speak up for Colin Kaepernick who has been shunned by the football industry for his Anthem Protests. Rapinoe highlighted the ways he’s been made to suffer even as she was awarded this prize for her activism on and off the field. This is an example of how people use platforms – both large and small – to speak up on behalf of others.
Transforming an unloved bus circle
Transition Town in Tooting, United Kingson, transformed an unloved bus circle into an ad-hoc village green. They hosted a day of gatherings with food, music, games, civic meetings, and more. This is an example of an under-emphasized type of action: positive action, constructive action, and building the solution. We often forget about the power and beauty of this type of action . . . but when we tap into it, it can unleash our hearts not just the heat of our outrage.
Nurses dress up newborns in red cardigans to honor Mr. Rogers
In honor of Mr. Roger’s wife, who visited a hospital on World Kindness Day, the nurses in the maternity ward dressed the newborns in red cardigans to honor a man who advocated kindness. This is a great example of how we don’t have to take to the streets to make a powerful point. Sometimes, taking action in our workplaces, schools, offices, stores, or even homes can be powerful and meaningful.
These are just a few of the many examples. I collect 30-50 stories of nonviolence in action each week. (You can sign-up for the free weekly newsletter here.) While we throw protest parties for our kids, let’s make sure that we’re learning about and engaging in the many other types of actions that are needed to make change. These are survival skills for all of us in a world that must change.
We provide educational resources on the safe and effective use of nonviolence, with the recognition that it’s not about putting the right person in power but awakening the right kind of power in people. We advance a higher image of humankind while empowering people to explore the question: How does nonviolence work, and how can I actively contribute to a happier, more peaceful society?
Waging Nonviolence partners with other organizations and publishes their work.
Resilience, the ability to adapt to rapid change, is a necessity for all ages now. The essence of nonviolent resistance is to gratefully see oneself in the context of the much greater system that is our container.
I love this Rivera Sun. Thanks for your work for nonviolence. I would like to work to promote nonviolence in my school in Canada.
Thanks, Tim. One idea might be to assign students to report on a youth-led resistance movement. They’d probably enjoy that assignment.
Hi David,
Yes. Resilience is absolutely required for all of us. I like your framing of how understanding interconnectedness is at the core of both resilience and nonviolence.
Rivera
Thanks for the post!
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/5139/nietzsche-and-the-abyss
As a former youth activist myself (50 years ago!) I am concerned about the potentially ageist language of referring to ourselves as “adults” and “grown-ups” implying that youth are kids. When I was 20/25/30 I identified as a youth but I also identified strongly as an adult. Activism started at 16 for me (and free thinking at 12). I was on my own living in my own apartment and earning my entire income by myself at 17. I was an adult. It concerns me that we do not consider a youth activist to also be an adult. Some are and some are not. How do we identify these differences, which apparently is important to do? I have thought about this a lot lately and I think that maybe people who are not youths could call themselves “allies”. So, Youth Climate Activists and Allies. What do you think? Ultimately, I would like to take direction from the youth and use the language that they prefer. Let’s also keep in mind that elders are not all older-aged. An elder is a thought leader. Greta Thunberg is an elder at 16. I am an elder at 68. When everyone is valued and respected equally how do we make these distinctions without using oppressive language. Ageism goes both ways.
Hi Emerald,
I think these are worthy concepts to explore and think about. I agree that ageism is flying around every which way in our culture. I think it’s sometimes useful to have some sort of language that can explore the differences and similarities in organizing around age groups. Ultimately, I think myself and many others are most interested in intergenerational movement-building, and finding ways to heal from ageism while acknowledging the beauty/shadows of how different ages offers different strengths and learning curves. As with any formation of identity, there will always be generalizations and exceptions when thinking, writing, and talking about the subject. For me, the key thing is to find ways to learn from the trends, patterns, and actions.
I think in the above article, the word “grown-ups” could be replaced with “intergenerational allies” without causing any confusion about the meaning of that section.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts,
Rivera