The heart of Plato’s Republic is a treatise on how humans are to organize themselves into a collective form of governance so as to best steer the ship of state. Five forms of government are posited—aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny—and philosophized about to determine which is most fit to govern the city. Lest we jump to quickly to conclusions, I’ll spoil the surprise for the high school seniors getting set to take on massive college debt to read Plato in freshman seminar: it’s not democracy.
So Plato—one of the most influential philosophers whose mentor (Socrates) was executed by the state—would not be a fan of Occupy Wall Street’s scathing critique of the corporate state? Hardly. He was just intimately aware of the dangers of majority (mob) rule as well as the tendency toward violence, repression, and injustice in timocracy, oligarchy, and tyranny. His vote—pun intended—was for an aristocracy where the philosopher-king (sic) ruled. Democracy, for Plato, is dangerous because of the willy-nilly nature of the masses, whose opinions can sway as quickly as the winds blow. It was direct democracy, after all, that sentenced his mentor to death. And as poll after poll shows—from Presidential candidate primaries to Jay Leno’s infamous “Jay-walking”—America may not be ready for direct democracy a la Athenian style.
But the course of human history has revealed, with particularly urgent reminders in 2011, that the people want to have a say in how their lives are governed. The philosophers and the ruling elites will acknowledge such desires with compassionate concern and then abruptly dismiss them as being naïve, too unrefined, and incapable to steer the ship. But this Platonic problem—how to steer the ship—lies not in rendering the leader(s) best fit for the helm, but in the size of the ship itself. It is a lot easier to steer a canoe than an ocean-liner. Too many captains on the ship? Well it’s a lot easier to reach consensus on a fishing boat than the Titanic.
Consider this: the titanic banks that are too big to fail demand the centralized power of the solitary philosopher-king type aristocracy for business as usual to function. But break those banks up, decentralize their power, localize the monetary reserves and fiduciary responsibility to neighborhoods whose charter is tied to rule of the people on the block, and that ship sails a lot smoother.
Critics no doubt will dismiss it a well-intentioned idealism and that we are stuck with what we got. But as General Assemblies, working groups, and Spokes Councils—including all their flaws and weaknesses—have proved able to steer the ship. Or rather, the many ships that is Occupy. As much as this movement is about saying no to the oligarchy disguised as an aristocracy that pretends to be a democracy, it is also about popular education, making each person fit to “rule” and giving their voices a platform to be heard—even as it struggles to do that with the vestiges patriarchy, racism, and other forms of oppression lingering in this movement.
At its best, having a preferential option for traditionally marginalized voices, so long as it avoids tokenism, can be recourse for building more inclusive, participatory communities. Speaker stacks that limit speaking time to two minutes force participants to clarify their thought and prevent opinions and comments from devolving into diatribes. Practices like the 90 percent majority rule for proposals to pass GAs at OWS and Occupy Chicago are examples of modified consensus that can be an added protection against 51 percent mob rule. The nonviolent people power of occupations and alternative forms of governance and decision-making that share power is a paradigm shift for what is possible. We are the 99 percent and we are the philosopher-kings, queens, and rulers of our own collective future.
Thanks for this so much, Jake—beautiful to see this movement in light of older reflections. I think, for instance, of how the assemblies in Athens’ Syntagma Square have revived the vocabulary of ancient Greek democracy to describe what they do.
I think the most important thing you say is about “popular education.” That, truly, is the most crucial aspect of this movement insofar as I’ve watched it closely. Those involved learn so much, so quickly. I sure have. But I would question whether, at least so far, the assemblies have managed to steer themselves. In every assembly process I’ve seen (at now 5 Occupy camps and counting), the process has been constantly derailed, distracted, broken down by people who don’t know what they’re doing. Precisely because this is a school, and because so many of us are so unpracticed in self-governance, there have been major hiccups. And I think the state of Zuccotti/Liberty on the eve of the eviction was in fact a sign of that. The same at Occupy SF, too.
That said, the cities’ practice of forceful eviction is completely wrong-headed. That just reenforces the idea that city government is the big brother that we all need to save us. There is so much more the wider community can do to help these occupations remain healthy, vibrant, exciting places, short of beating people with clubs and making their eyes burn. And there is so much more the occupiers can do (or could have done) as well.
Have you read Michael Albert’s piece on ZNet on Self-governance? http://www.zcommunications.org/occupy-to-self-manage-by-michael-albert
I agree with what you are saying – its a disciplined practice that I think gets lost when urgency and adrenaline are running the show. Direct action is important but I think its emphasis and execution can derail decision-making and cloud clarity. I’ve experienced that in myself and continue to try and learn from those experiences. That’s when our worst selves can come out, falling into old habits, patterns of oppression, dominating each other. Being patient and forgiving of ourselves and gently teaching/reminding each other how to self-govern is equally important
Magnificent post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector don’t notice this. You must proceed your writing. I am confident, you’ve a great readers’ base already!|What’s Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively helpful and it has aided me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & help different users like its aided me. Good job.