Earlier this month, the War Resisters League launched a discussion series focused on zones of conflict that are neglected in American anti-war circles. The first event centered on Kashmir, the site of the world’s longest running military occupation, dating back to the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947. Both countries make territorial claims in the region that clash with Kashmiri demands for self-determination and drive settler colonial violence. The South Asia Solidarity Initiative, or SASI, used this opportunity to draw attention to violence in the region, such as the brutal rape and murder of eight-year-old Asifa Bano, a Kashmiri Muslim girl.
Asifa was a member of the Bakarwal Muslim community, which relies on herding livestock in the Kathua district of Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Her alleged perpetrators were Hindu nationalists. She was kidnapped in January and held in a local Hindu temple, where she was drugged, gang raped and beaten to death.
The identities of the alleged perpetrators were confirmed in March by a Special Investigation Team. Reports say they meant to terrorize her community in order to drive them from the area. Sanji Ram, a former bureaucrat who has been named as the mastermind behind this attack, has a history of violence aimed at Bakarwals in Kathua. Ram’s record as a bigot and agitator includes sexual violence and inciting Hindus in Kathua to deny Bakarwals access to land. Attempts to displace Kashmiris based on religious and ethnic identity date back to 1947. More recently, the Bakarwals have been subjected to a boycott pushed by Hindu nationalists aiming to undermine their livelihoods.
As details of the case came to light, local Hindu nationalists tied to India’s ruling party, the chauvinist Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP, scrambled to defend a posse of eight men who were arrested over connections to the rape and homicide. They mobilized a campaign called the Hindu Ekta Manch aimed at obstructing justice in this case. Lal Singh Chaudry, a former BJP politician who threatened Kashmiri Muslims with ethnic cleansing in 2016, joined a rally defending the alleged perpetrators.
Over the past few months, SASI has aimed to mobilize South Asian communities against both the Hindu right’s salvos and the ideology justifying Kashmir’s occupation. On April 18, the organization partnered with Equality Labs, a tech startup led by South Asian activists from marginalized communities, to rally people to New York’s Union Square. Around a hundred people showed up to decry the atrocities perpetrated against Asifa Bano and her community.
A Kashmiri activist who was invited to speak at the mobilization called on attendees to see Asifa’s death as part of an occupation that “continues to use sexual violence as a weapon of war, continues to brutalize Kashmiri bodies and erase Kashmiri identity.” This activist, who asked to remain anonymous, said that India’s vision of Kashmir as part of its territory is a crucial factor in that brutality and erasure.
Self-identified Hindu progressives and adherents of a more secular nationalism tended to view the atrocity perpetrated against Asifa as a “social-sexual” crime linked solely to religious hatred. On April 16, Sadhana, a group describing itself as a “coalition of progressive Hindus,” held its own “Against the Rapes in India” rally in Union Square. Asifa’s story was shared alongside those of Indian rape victims in Unnao and Surat. Board member Sunita Vishwanath responded to the BJP, specifically addressing the Hindu Ekta Manch. “Ekta is [a] word that’s very important to the Hindus,” she told India Abroad. “[I]t means oneness, it means unity, and we will not let such words that are sacred to us be co-opted by hate mongers and rapists.”
Responses like this, however, have been criticized for characterizing Asifa as an Indian victim. Including her in a list of Indian victims erases the fact that she was a Kashmiri victim of India’s occupation. One of SASI’s goals in the coming months, explained organizer Robindra Deb, is to challenge and unpack the ways in which Indians treat Kashmir — as if it were part of India irrespective of how Kashmiris feel. One Kashmiri organizer contended that the effect of calling Asifa an Indian victim was to “selectively erase the decades of violence that Kashmiri women have suffered and the persistent use of sexual violence against Kashmiri individuals across the gender spectrum.”
Furthermore, historian Hafsa Kanjwal has noted that “when Kashmiri women get raped … and when young Kashmiri girls are … killed” by the Indian army “there is no liberal outrage in India.” Kashmir is one of the world’s most militarized areas, with a ratio of one soldier for every 20 civilians. Over 700,000 Indian soldiers have been deployed to the region in response to mass movements for Kashmiri self-determination and as part of an exercise of power directed at Pakistan. This military presence is known for responding to protests and demands for autonomy with extreme violence.
As in other conflict zones, sexual violence towards Kashmiris is a constant feature of the Indian occupation and is used to “punish, intimidate and degrade Kashmiris at large,” Kanjwal explained. The 1991 siege of the villages of Kunan and Poshpura — during which the Indian army allegedly raped up to 100 women — along with the alleged rape and murder in 2009 of two women by police in the town of Shopian illustrate this dynamic. “Kashmiri civil society groups have documented 7,000 cases of sexual violence that also include violence against men in custody, including sodomy,” Kanjwal said.
Both Kanjwal and Mohamad Junaid, a Kashmiri scholar and activist, note how the suffering of Kashmiris in Jammu and Kashmir is obscured because India claims them as citizens. “In Kashmir, the Indian government claims the people it shoots down, blinds and treats with cruelty are Indian citizens,” Junaid said. “This confuses people who are not so familiar with what is going on in Kashmir because they think Kashmiris are Indians when they are facing the same kind of cruelty and atrocity as Palestinians.”
SASI hopes to illuminate these dynamics for a broad audience. This objective underpinned the teach-in that SASI co-hosted with the War Resister League on June 3, which covered both the history of occupation and movements for self-determination in Kashmir. Hafsa Kanjwal and Mohamad Junaid discussed these issues and were joined by a third speaker, Palestinian activist and member of the Decolonize This Place collective Amin Hussain. Hussain explained how the dearth of attention paid to Kashmiri resistance undermines the positions of those purporting to oppose other occupations, such as the Israeli presence in Palestine.
The teach-in drew upon groundwork that has been laid for transnational opposition to the occupation of Kashmir. “When you are from Palestine, or are a Tamil from Sri Lanka, or a Kurd — when you are any other nationality who has had a war imposed upon you or are living under an occupation — [Kashmir] instinctively resonates,” Juniad said prior to the event.
Amin Hussein attested to this during the teach-in when he talked about a longstanding affinity between self-determination movements that link Palestine and Kashmir. Recalling how he has been active in the Palestinian resistance since the age of 12, Hussein said he was “raised knowing about Kashmir.” He situated the struggles against settler colonialism in Kashmir alongside the Ferguson uprising and Standing Rock, calling each of these struggles for self-determination part of a “spirit that has been coming back.”
A new book explores how Miss Major has persevered over six inspiring decades on the frontlines of the queer and trans liberation movement.
Humor in Native culture has never been simply about entertainment. Comedy is also used to fight cultural invisibility and structural oppression.
Waging Nonviolence is hiring a writer to interview leading movement figures and analysts and produce one Q&A-style article per week. The writer will work with our small editorial team to identify the interview subject each week. For the most part, we’ll be looking to hear from activists, organizers and scholars who can shed light on… More
The practice of gang rape/violence/aggression is a common practice among minorities throughout India practiced by majority Hindu nationalist.
This reflects their training/teaching given in temples right from the first day of schooling.
They have tried all sorts of violence on kashmiries, perhaps they are now tired to practice any more.
This signals the freedom of common man of Kashmir from the so-called Hindu aggression.
Yes; peace is a very needed factor in the sub continent. HOWEVER, PR-PAKISTHANI OR PRO-INDIA MOVEMENTS WILL NEVER SOLVE THE PROBLEM. I DO NOT BELIEVE EITHER INDIA OR PAKISTHAN WILL YIELD AN INCH OF LAND. AND D DO NOT BELIEVE THE PEOPLE OF BOTH INDIA AND PAKISTHAN WANT TO CONTINUE WITH THE FIGHT, BUT PEACE.
MY IDEA IS UTOPIAN. I, ON MY EARLY YEARS IN USA (1980 s) HAVE SENT LEADERS OF BOTH COUNTRIES AN IDEA OF COOPERATION BETWEEN TWO COUNTRIES. IT SUGGESTED A COMMISSION CONSISTING OF BOTH COUNTRIES TO RUN THE ADMINISTRATION OF DISPUTED REGION, WITH THE SOLE INTEND OF PEACE AND HARMONY. THE COMMISSION CAN DEVELOP CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES. YES THE COMMISSION TO RUN THE DISPUTED REGION UNTIL A PERMANENT SOLUTION IS MADE. I HAD NO REPLY FROM ANY OF THE PARTIES. I THEN BELIEVED MY IDEA IS A TRASH AND STOPPED.
IF YOU LOVE PEACE YOU MAY CONSIDER.
I AM AN INDIAN BY BIRTH AND BELIEVE BOTH INDIA AND PAKISTHAN
THE SAME. IF THERE IS VIOLENCE, IT IS BY THE PEOPLE WHO WANT VIOLENCE. MY BEST FRIENDS IN INDIA, THEY INCLUDE HINDUS, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS AND WE HAD NO FIGHT BASED ON RELIGION.
You missed a part of the history. The Arab Muslims invade Kashmir since 7th century, and there were Hindu Rajas there who fought back. “After the Arabs, it was the Ghaznavids who attempted to conquer Kashmir. Mahmud of Ghazni, known for his numerous invasions into India, defeated Raja Jaipal (1002 C.E), the ruler of Waihand (near Peshawar, in modernday Pakistan).Anandpal, the son and successor of Jaipal, also suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of Mahmud in 1009 C.E., and died a few years later.” [“Wikipedia”] So it’s like the Israelis went into the “promised land” and killed everyone in their path.
Another important feature is first Prime Minister of India, Pandit Nehru was from Kashmir; therefore, he was attached to preserving his homeland for India.
So the hate and division goes back for centuries. Continuing it will not solve anything. It only makes sense after centuries of conflicts that Kashmir is given its independence so it can use its recourses to heal from within and create a safe life for themselves.
It has been clearly proven that colonialism, conflict and war is never going to give peace and prosperity to this beautiful land.
admire the work you are doing while bringing this post.
However The big piece you have missed to mention is about “World’s Biggest exodus based on ethnicity” of last century.
in 90s, Kashmiri Pandits (Hindu caste) were killed, evicted and tortured by the “So called peaceful Victim Muslim Extremists” . Kindly fact check the horror they have faced and they fear for their life even today and would not go to their homeland.
Of course, one act of terror does not justify the other. But, it would be naive to think, there will not have any consequence out of anger.
Kindly give space to this context, and not be selective. However, I do support your solidarity against this cruel act.
If interested, and Kashmiri Pandits lives matter, please stand by them too.