People power scored a major victory last week when Tunisians drove out US-backed dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali after a month-long nationwide pro-democracy uprising. Despite a heavy focus by Western media on scenes of rioting and looting, the uprising was largely nonviolent and unarmed. Not only does this challenge Western perceptions of the Arab world, but it also offers inspiration to Arabs suffering under similar oppression. As Issandr El Amrani wrote in the Guardian:
The elation felt across the Arab world over the Tunisian uprising is deep and palpable. It is not simply that, like most people, Arabs are pleased to see a long-repressed people finally have a shot at gaining their freedom. It is also that many recognise themselves in the Tunisian people and share their hopes, their fears, and also their guilt.
These emotions came to a head last month when the space to finally criticize rampant corruption, cronyism and unemployment was created by the tragic self-immolation of a young street vendor named Mohamed Bou’aziz. By causing physical harm to no one but himself, Bou’aziz managed to garner sympathy for the pro-democracy cause and create space for actual nonviolent resistance in a region more typically marred by suicide bombings.
To better understand the role and extent of nonviolence in the Tunisian uprising, I turned to Srdja Popovic, whose Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (CANVAS) in Belgrade has worked with some Tunisian dissidents in recent years. He told Waging Nonviolence:
While the protests were initially spontaneous and likely without a grand strategic vision, there was a fair amount of tactical coordination involving the trade unions, influential bloggers and others in civil society, as well as extensive use of Facebook and other social media. The protests built gradually, starting with the suicide incident in the small city of Sidi Bouzid, then grew and moved to a few larger cities before, finally, throwing itself in front of governmental buildings in the capital. Using this “nonviolent blitzkrieg” and clever tactics such as “distract and dislocate”, protesters were able to match up against 100,000 armed forces, which was the approximate manpower of the government’s uniformed coercive pillars at the beginning of conflict.
The protesters also showed tremendous unity, a key element in most nonviolent struggles. The students and youth who were alone when they started protesting unemployment, were soon backed by the lawyers, and then labor unions. Teachers and more youngsters got involved as soon as the government made the mistake to close the schools. So, the policy of small victories was there, building toward the announced general strike last Friday. Although it never happened, it was a signal for president Ben Ali to make his last move: dissolve the government, call the army and lose the final game.
Having discussed this with some of our friends and experts, I think despite the limited violence we can certainly count Tunisia as a candidate for another “victorious” unarmed insurrection. How victorious it will be, however, depends on future events—most of all the forthcoming elections scheduled by transitional authorities.
On a certain level, however, Tunisians have already succeeded. As Popovic pointed out, they “faced down bullets and tear gas and overthrew a US-backed dictator” and did so without any third party involvement, due in large part to the instability of its neighbors and Western-ties to Ben Ali.
First off, the regional environment is “shaky”, considering the immediate response to the Tunisian events by Algerian activists, the protests surrounding Egypt’s transition of power, the Sudanese referendum, and the latest unfortunate developments in Lebanon. Secondly, the “usual suspects”, namely western democracies led by the US and in this case partly France, were obviously caught off guard and definitely cannot be accused—as in the case of the “Color Revolutions”—of being behind these events. In fact, widespread opinion is that the US backed Ali for quite a long period, or at least did nothing to encourage his opponents. So, the Tunisian uprising is definitely authentic and homegrown.
That is not to say, however, that the uprising is without its influences. According to Popovic, Tunisians used a slogan (“Yezzi fock”) that means “It’s enough”—similar to slogans used by democracy activists in Zimbabwe, Georgia and Sudan.
This transferring of knowledge reminds Popovic of the youth democracy movement that emerged in Serbia, continued successfully through Georgia and Ukraine, and then unsuccessfully (but significantly) in a few other former Soviet countries. Could this mean we are seeing a resurrection of youth democracy movements, perhaps this time in the Arab world?
It seems evident that activists from Egypt, Sudan and Tunisia are connected or at least learning from each other. Not only are their movements looking alike regarding their manifestos, methodology, slogans and symbols, but they seem to communicate among themselves and efficiently support each other.
Not surprisingly, the Western media has already begun to anticipate the extent to which Tunisia will inspire other pro-democracy uprisings in the Arab world. New York Times op-ed columnist Roger Cohen asked this week, “Is Tunis the Arab Gdansk?”
With so many unanswered questions about the future of Tunisia—and already signs that the interim government is faltering—it’s hard to know the lasting effect of this uprising. Issandr El Amrani perhaps put it best, writing in the Guardian:
Tunisia’s revolution, to become contagious, must be both peaceful and mark a real break. It must find the balance between punishing those who backed the Ben Ali regime and forgiveness for those who, in myriad ways, took part in a system that sometimes left them little choice. It must show that democracy and stability are not incompatible on Arab soil. It must boost the arguments made by the likes of the Egyptian opposition figure and Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei that, on their current paths, many Arab regimes are heading towards an ugly dead end.
The Tunisian example may or may not inspire popular uprisings elsewhere. But it should send a loud and clear message to largely politically disengaged and complicit Arab elites that, if they do not start pushing for peaceful change now, what happened in Tunisia could happen in their country. The outcome, though, might be much uglier.
When diaspora Jews and those living in Israel join with Palestinians, they forge a more powerful and just movement to end the occupation.
From grassroots movements to presidential hopefuls, the importance of creating visionary plans for change is no longer being ignored.
By appealing to the hearts and minds of their white neighbors, Native Americans are carving out common ground and building unity through diversity.