Can two weeks of mass action in DC stop the tar sands pipeline?

    Starting Saturday, farmers, ranchers, Gulf Coast residents, faith leaders and climate activists from across the United States and Canada will be marching on the White House, holding sit-ins and risking arrest every day for two weeks because President Obama, with the support of the State Department, may soon allow the construction of an oil pipeline from Alberta to the U.S. Gulf Coast—a decision that would not only endanger farmland and drinking water, but also, in the words of NASA scientist James Hansen, signal “game over for the climate.”

    Given these dangers, a mass sustained action of civil disobedience, the likes of which has not been seen in America for quite some time, seems unquestionably necessary. Whether such an action can force a “no” decision, however, is another story and one that can’t be known until things are underway.

    For one thing, it will be interesting to see how the organizers are prepared to deal with police not making arrests—as was the case with the 2009 Capitol Climate Action that sought to close a coal-fired power plant in Washington DC. Caught somewhat off-guard and needing something to show for their efforts, organizers ended up accepting a mild concession from Congress that allowed for the plant to switch to natural gas.

    That decision was criticized by some veteran environmentalists at the time as a sign of the climate movement’s timidity and concern only with small victories. While such criticism could be brushed off two years ago—when the climate movement was finding its legs—the tipping point has only drawn closer and there will likely be little allowance for mistakes or concessions this time around, especially over an issue as potentially devastating as further development of the tar sands.

    It would seem the organizers are aware of this, at least by the fact that they’re committing to two weeks of civil disobedience, not just one day. But is two weeks really enough? It might be if Obama had to render a decision by September 3, the final day of the protest. But in actuality there is no deadline. Obama has said his timetable is “before the end of the year.”

    So, the real question seems to be: what will be accomplished with two weeks of protest that hasn’t been accomplished with one?

    I look forward to finding out and remain optimistic, for as Margaret Mead once said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

    If anyone reading this will be in DC this weekend, let me know. I’ll look for you there!

    Recent Stories

    • Feature

    The Little Big Union joins the growing movement to transform fast food

    April 22, 2019

    Using “solidarity union” tactics, workers at a popular Portland burger chain have launched a union to fight for their basic labor rights.

      How Sudan’s protesters upped the ante and forced al-Bashir from power

      April 17, 2019

      The Sudanese people took to the streets for more than a struggling economy. They were calling for freedom, peace, justice and the downfall of the regime.

      • Analysis

      Progressive coalition boycotts ‘woke-washing’ of San Francisco event space

      April 13, 2019

      Activists are confronting a San Francisco event space with a self-proclaimed “social justice” mission over gentrification and its owner’s outspoken Zionism.