The people who’ve come from around the country to occupy Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C. helped fulfill their promise to “Stop the Machine” by entering, and ultimately closing down for the day, the Smithsonian’s Air and Space Museum. They chose the museum for its glorification of weaponry in general, its special exhibit on unmanned flying drones in particular, and the tribute it pays to the arms industry by naming its IMAX theater after Lockheed Martin.
Today’s action was proposed at Friday night’s General Assembly meeting on the plaza, most vocally by David Swanson—creator of, as well as much else, WarIsACrime.org. Some initially objected that its meaning might be lost on onlookers, but the idea prevailed.
The march itself—or “stroll,” as it was called, to avoid militaristic jargon—started around 2 p.m. today and reached the museum about half an hour later. Swanson was leading the march, together with members of Code Pink and a contingent of young Wisconsinites. (Also in the lead was confessed agent provocateur Patrick Howley, one of the “hundreds of earnest and principled reporters” whose careers The American Spectator claims to have launched.) Several protesters made it inside and, from the second floor, dropped a pink banner that said, “NO DRONES / END AFGHAN WAR.” But when as many as 500 “strolling” people surged up into the museum carrying signs and chanting, guards used pepper spray to repel them as they got just inside the doorway.
Within seconds, those entering the building turned back, coughing and holding their eyes and writhing in pain. People outside, themselves breathing in the peppery air and coughing, poured water on their faces. Soon, there was a short standoff with police officers, followed by a rally on the steps of the museum and a performance by the Bread and Puppet Theater. Somebody provoked the man playing music across the street to go on a loud rant in his microphone against the protesters, but then he played songs for them. There was an assembly-style discussion. Several model drones—realistic-looking and otherwise—accompanied the group.
When word had come that some of those who had been apprehended would be released on the other side of the building, a group of marchers went there to greet them. They staged a sit-in, blocking the back entrance and singing songs like “This Little Light of Mine” and “If I Had a Hammer.” All the doors of the museum were already locked anyway, and it was closed for the rest of the day. Tourists continued to approach it and many went away angry.
One woman was arrested in the incident, the first arrest of the ongoing occupations in D.C.: 19-year-old Thi Le of Madison, Wisconsin. She was released within a few hours and received by fellow protesters who waited for her outside the precinct.
The outcome of the confrontation remains to be seen—especially in whatever crowds might come to Freedom Plaza on Sunday. An incident with pepper spray was of course a turning point for winning public sympathy for Occupy Wall Street, and it may be again in D.C. But in the case of Wall Street there was no apparent justification. At Air and Space, however, despite the use of probably excessive force by the guards, many outside observers might also see it as a necessary measure of crowd control to protect a national museum. The protesters say they had no intention to damage anything—later on they chanted to police officers and guards, “We are peaceful!”—but this might have been made clearer from the outset.
According to messages on Twitter, members of the separate occupation that began on October 1 at McPherson Square on K Street have made a point of distancing themselves from the action.
Despite some complaints that the reason for targeting the Air and Space Museum weren’t obvious enough, the action surely made a lot of people think about the museum and what it represents in a new way. The signs and props protesters carried conveyed their opposition to ongoing wars abroad and to the celebration of weapons that goes on inside. There were a large number of people visibly identified as veterans taking part, as well as military family members. The idea of going to a museum to admire technologies designed for killing was certainly called into question by this action. Unlike the sites of Occupy Wall Street confrontations, which have occurred on roadways, the target here made sense.
Less successful at first glance, however, was the tactic that ultimately met with pepper spray. The protesters could have sent a powerful message without appearing so threatening to guards, much less to visitors inside. The banner-drop was an example of this. So was the sit-in. But when a large, loud crowd leaves the street and moves toward a building, those leading it should be aware of the effect that they’re having on those in their path, and of the ways they might be antagonizing the very people they’re intending to win.
Movement-building, though, isn’t always pretty. Sometimes it burns.
I hope that by now everyone has seen the story about the instigator for the pepper spray incident. If not, you can read about it
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/08/1024352/-Conservative-Magazine-Brags-of-its-Agent-Provocateurs-Role-in-Provoking-Police-Action-in-DC-
The protesters can do nothing to control people who aren’t even part of the movement!!
More than that, there was another provocateur who admitted to actually pushing a guard, and he has returned to the plaza several times since. That said, I don’t think the provocateurs are entirely to blame for the charging of the museum.
Stupid action. “Stop the Machine” is stepping all over the much more powerful message of Occupy Wall Street. The Oct. 6 organizers should have been smart enough to understand that — instead they try to jump in front of a parade they didn’t create.
I agree with Dave Weigel writing in Slate tonight: “One D.C. organizer sympathetic to the Occupiers warned me last week that the 10/6-ers were totally capable of dragging the new movement down with their ineffective, camera-hungry strategy. What does a protest of drones have to do with a new populist protest of income disparity and bank deregulation? The question answers itself. What does radio host Mike Malloy’s widely-reported speech to the 10/6 rally, about how George W. Bush should be tried for war crimes, have to with it? Another dumb question. These protesters have it in them to wreck the image of the new movement.”
Craig: I think you need to group the defense industry in with the corporate greed that #occupywallstreet is targeting. Our bloated defense budget is money that we can and should be putting towards social programs that actually help people rather than kill people. We currently spend hundreds of billions of dollars on our military budget, which is more than the rest of the world spends on their militaries COMBINED. To tie it back in to drones specifically, it costs roughly $4.5 million to build a drone, and many of the ones that have already been built have crashed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Somehow we can find millions of dollars to spend on drones that may just end up as pile of rubble, but somehow we can’t seem to find money for social programs like helping low-income families heat their home or pay the salaries of teachers. There’s something wrong with this picture. Perhaps both OccupyDC and October6 could do a better job of coordinating their actions and making clear to observers the connection between corporate greed and our grossly expensive wars (over $1 trillion and counting)?
This comment is needlessly dismissive. Having been to several Occupy DC general assemblies in which Freedom Plaza was discussed, I can say that the general sense of the group there is that they’re in complete solidarity with October 2011—”in movement, but not in action.” In fact, there were Occupy DC people at the Air & Space action, just as there were Freedom Plaza-ers who disagreed with it. As this entire occupation movement has been, pretty much, these things sometimes get messy. But that doesn’t mean that an occupation with many of the same tactics and priorities should be denounced. If the movement is to grow, it needs to learn how to embrace undertakings like this constructively.
In New York State where I live, taxpayers contributed $14.5 billion in Fiscal Year 2011 to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (See, http://costofwar.com/en/tradeoffs/state/NY/program/11/tradeoff/0) or about three times the annual revenues generated by the state’s millionaire’s tax which is set to expire at the end of the year and which progressives will fight mightily to have restored. The connection between war spending and social injustice should be obvious but if the 10/6ers aren’t getting that message across even to other activists, they have more work to do.
If this movement is to continue to grow, it needs to learn how to call out bullshit when it happens – or the wackos among us will define us. “Occupying the Smithsonian” was an incredibly stupid political action — a crowded, hugely popular Saturday afternoon tourist attraction. Washington is full of symbols of the economic injustice we all face — K Street lobbyists, the IMF, the World Bank, etc, etc. And they target the Smithsonian??? I’m against drones; the outrageous military spending but all our issues have at their core: profits matter more than people. The Occupy Wall Street actions and simple messaging “we are the 99%” have been organic, effective and brilliant. The “Stop the Machine” organizers have tried to jump in front of a parade they didn’t create. Hopefully, they won’t do anymore damage to this blossoming movement.
It’s worth clarifying that Medea Menjamin, one of the key organizers of the march, insists that neither closing the museum nor storming it was the plan. Their intention was to hold a 10-person “die-in” and a banner drop. She accuses the provocateurs, mainly, of calling for the charge.
The plan, therefore, was much more restrained. The problem, therefore, was in enforcing unity and discipline. Most people on the march didn’t know what they were there to do, and so when a call for a charge was made by provocateurs, they didn’t know that this was not what was and wasn’t part of the plan.
I agree that protesting is part of our heritage and it is also part of our Constitutional freedoms. However, the idea that blocking or bum rushing a museum because you don’t like the exhibit can be considered a form of censorship.
Taken to its logical conclusion, does this give the protestors the right to enter a library and block books on war or the military? Or Atheists the right to block access to bibles? Or whatever you feel is wrong from being accessible? Or blocking the Harry Potter series because you feel it condones witchcraft? Who’s truth is THE truth? Information is power and we are free to view and read what we wish and make our own decision, even if it upsets people.
Perhaps what we need is a “Musuem of Protest.” This way those who feel the need to bring light to social and economic issues can build their own collections and exhibits and freely express their values. Then, those who wish to enter such a space are equally free to do so. Hey, if we have a “Museum of Sex” in NYC, anything is possible.
But the danger here is that such actions hurt the same free expression and access to information that the protestors feel is their right to express. Rarely does mob rule lead to democracy!
I also agree that as a tactic, “shock value” such as run and jump attacks on public buildings will get noticed, but I doubt they’ll win many friends. Unlike the Wall Street protestors, who are peacefully protesting their concerns regarding the state of the economy, these folks in DC really need to be better organized and focused.
It’s worth noting that Freedom Plaza actions have generally been much more organized and focused than those of Occupy Wall Street. So far, FP protesters have been arrested at a museum that they see as glorifying war and in Congressional office buildings—and all knew they were risking arrest. OWS protesters, in contrast, have largely been arrested on a street and on a bridge—and mostly by surprise and as a result of poor planning and lack of discipline. (In both cases, this blocked access to these thoroughfares to the public for hours at a time.) This isn’t to say that they were wrong; however, if anything, the actions Freedom Plaza has been launching are introducing a new level of planning and focus to the occupation movement’s acts of civil resistance.
THIS ACTION OF THE GOVERNMENT MEANS THAT YOU ARE SUCCEEDING.PLEASE DO CREATE STREET THEATERS AS WELL IN ORDER TO MAKE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE GOOD MESSAGE.IN ADDITION SHORT STORIES CAN HELP A LOT IN UNDERSTANDING THE THINGS.