Controversial development projects spark protests in Panama

    Photo by La Asociación de los Amigos y Vecinos de Casco Viejo.

    Panama’s Casco Viejo, recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site for its inestimable cultural and historic significance, is a haven for tourists seeking the dilapidated, preserved or restored relics of the country’s not-so-humble colonial beginnings. But aside from its old world flavor and upscale tourist appeal, Casco Viejo and its residents are facing the grim realities of corporate domination and expansion which have ignited controversy regarding the state-sponsored notions of “development” and “progress.”

    On June 26, over 500 protesters, undeterred by torrential downpours, hit the streets of the Old Town and demanded that President Martinelli and his administration abandon their plans to construct what is known as “Cinta Costera III,” a multi-billion dollar project that consists of a series of bridges, landfills and pedestrian pathways that the government says is necessary for the vitality of the city as well as for the residents of Chorillo, a bordering ghetto.

    In an interview with Patrizia Pinzon, a member of the Association of the Friends and Neighbors of Casco Viejo and a prominent voice in the resistance movement against Cinta Costera, she said:

    It is a matter of priorities, those of big business and those of the people here. The former administration placed a higher priority on social investment and was establishing the infrastructure and mechanisms that would help the area’s most vulnerable inhabitants — things like low-income housing and schools. But the Martinelli administration has converted most of these previous developments into opportunities to expand its political power and influence for the benefit of the rich.

    Pinzon mentioned the housing crisis and how several buildings, despite their deplorable condition, have been occupied by residents in desperate need of housing. She explained:

    There is no need for this project and it is a huge waste of tax dollars. It will only benefit a small group of greedy people. The whole country is in crisis and is selling its assets. The last thing we need is something like this.

    While the state’s official rationale is couched in charitable and humanitarian rhetoric, members of the project’s opposition hold a more cynical point of view — that it is tantamount to forced gentrification. Pinzon continues:

    They are going to kick out every single person from Chorrillo, everyone knows it. Right now, they are going into Chorrillo and offering people there $20 to come out and speak out in support of Cinta Costera. And this is what we are up against.

    Pitu, a resident of Casco Viejo for more than 20 years, shared a similar view regarding the project:

    To be clear, I believe this project is not necessary, at least for the reasons that the Government proposes. The government likes to reiterate that the project will lead to the creation of jobs, but this is not the way to achieve such an end. With a more comprehensive and planned approach, so much more could be achieved. In addition, the way the project has been planned, we now run the risk of losing our World Heritage status, all the while breaking national laws and setting a bad precedent. The worst part is that it would affect the integrity of the community given that the project would distort the very narrative that this site offers.

    Little in the way of evidence from urban development specialists (engineers, city planners, etc.) has been presented by the state, a fact that only fuels public suspicions of the government’s greed. In fact, the lack of transparency regarding the relationship between the state and Norberto Odebrech, the Brazilian contractor responsible for Cinta’s construction, has created an altogether corrupt atmosphere surrounding the project. In addition, an alternative, less costly and seemingly more sensible plan which called for the construction of a tunnel has been mysteriously scrapped.

    Panama Viejo, the site of the country’s original capital and also a designated UNESCO World Heritage site, is facing a similar fate. Residents there may be expelled while excavations and projected plans — also “won” by Odebrech — threaten the integrity of monumental sites of historical significance.

    While Martinelli attempts to write off the resistance as a “small group of people,” recent protests and the fact that more than 33,000 people have shown support on the movement’s Facebook page, belies its alleged insignificance. The opposition to Cinta — people who truly care about preserving their history and culture while investing in the lives of its current residents — is in this for the long haul. A member of the movement who asked to remain anonymous said, “We are currently carrying out legal actions… but at some point it will be necessary to gather a big group and literally lay in front of the bulldozers that will attempt to start building the viaduct starting on Chorrillo`s landfill.”

    Recent Stories

    • Analysis

    5 lessons from the K-pop fans who fizzled Trump’s Tulsa rally, and the Black organizers who led the way

    July 3, 2020

    As K-pop fans and Black organizers and artists are demonstrating, joyful, powerful movements draw more people in and reflect the kind of world we want to live in.

    • Analysis

    In times of rapid change, victory comes to those who train for it

    June 30, 2020

    If soldiers train for armed combat, why wouldn’t activists train for toppling the political-economic structure that’s killing our chance for a just future? The stakes are just as high.

    • Feature

    Militarized lockdowns and a predatory quarantine — the unique story of Uganda’s pandemic response

    June 26, 2020

    Uganda’s COVID-19 experience underscores the seemingly universal opportunism of authoritarians amidst crisis, as well as opportunities for resistance.