Today is Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday, not the national holiday which is Monday. As an activist member of Jewish Voice for Peace, I have at times faced counter-demonstrations while I speak out against unjustifiable atrocities being committed allegedly for me and by “my” side. Being from the United States, I could be doubly responsible for the US/Israeli treatment of the Palestinians. As a long-time member of the War Resisters League, King and I share a belief that (in his words) “social change comes more meaningfully through nonviolence,” that the “business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love,” and that God didn’t choose “America as his divine, messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world.” 42 years have passed since he was assassinated.
So I am perplexed when I see “pro-Israel” signs that extol Martin Luther King’s defense of Israel, using quotes (which I also am fond of doing) by the late revolutionary, but in their case, highlighting things he said that seem to place him on “their” side of the police line, not mine. On the occasion of his birth, newsletters of synagogues may even have articles touting King as a staunch defender of Israel’s right to defend itself. They take quotes from 42 years ago as I do, to make our points. Certainly, after the Six Day War of 1967 (and before), King defended Israel. However, events of the last two score years I think would have reinforced King’s pacifism and “eternal hostility towards militarism, racism and economic exploitation.” He never would have become an anti-Semite, but I do think facts on the ground would have led him to become quite critical of Israel. I want to briefly mention five specific issues that would have negatively effected King’s perspective on Israel:
I certainly don’t think King would have become an anti-Semite, but he may have become an anti-Zionist. They are not the same thing. “The truth must be told, and I say that those who are seeking to make it appear that anyone who opposes the war in Vietnam is a fool or a traitor or an enemy of our soldiers is a person that has taken a stand against the best in our tradition.” That is a quote of his that I have no doubt could accurately be updated to go beyond mention of Vietnam and include every military adventure subsequently waged by “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today–my own government,” including the US/Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories.
Humor in Native culture has never been simply about entertainment. Comedy is also used to fight cultural invisibility and structural oppression.
Waging Nonviolence is hiring a writer to interview leading movement figures and analysts and produce one Q&A-style article per week. The writer will work with our small editorial team to identify the interview subject each week. For the most part, we’ll be looking to hear from activists, organizers and scholars who can shed light on… More
By melding theory and practice, Philadelphia’s Vanguard S.O.S. are building skills and collective power.
Thanx for this thought provoking article. its about time Jews and Arabs began to see one another as fellow human beings and put down their swords.
Well said, Jim!!!!! Thank you so much for the clear examples of Zionists taking a great peacemaker’s words and twisting them to justify their own cruelty. I am so proud of you for saying the Zionist word out loud and I agree, MLK may not have become anti-Israel, but most likely he would cut to the chase and call a Zionist a Zionist.
I hope that more in America will discover that Zionism does not equate to anti-Semitism. Then perhaps the next time I visit Iran and give an interview, I won’t have to hang my head in shame and answer through tears “I don’t know why the U.S. did not investigate Rachel Corrie’s death at the hands of an Israeli soldier driving a Catapillar bulldozer made in the U.S.A.”
Jim, I hope your essay reaches multitudes on this day of rememberance and that many thoughts are provoked.
I enjoyed this article but I wish it would have included more quotes/thoughts from Dr. King about Israel (during his lifetime). The Vietnam analogies are interesting, but that former piece is conspicuously absent.
Let me say, though, Jim, that as someone who has seen pro-gun activists (who carry concealed handguns 24/7) use King’s quotes (excerpted and without context) to further their agenda, I can sympathize.
Thanks for putting this on my website. great article. I really do not know how to blog, thus I have a site and put my own stuff up when something gets published, but I’m thrilled to have another voice. Keep going and add to my blogspot anytime.