As the new Martin Luther King memorial is unveiled this month, there is going to be a lot of nonsense batted around about how much our post-racist society reflects the fruit of his dream. But Princeton philosopher and “bluesman in the life of the mind” Cornel West preempts this in a powerful op-ed in Thursday’s New York Times:
The age of Obama has fallen tragically short of fulfilling King’s prophetic legacy. Instead of articulating a radical democratic vision and fighting for homeowners, workers and poor people in the form of mortgage relief, jobs and investment in education, infrastructure and housing, the administration gave us bailouts for banks, record profits for Wall Street and giant budget cuts on the backs of the vulnerable.
He highlights four “catastrophes” that King was going to name in the sermon he was planning to preach the Sunday after his death:
Militarism is an imperial catastrophe that has produced a military-industrial complex and national security state and warped the country’s priorities and stature (as with the immoral drones, dropping bombs on innocent civilians). Materialism is a spiritual catastrophe, promoted by a corporate media multiplex and a culture industry that have hardened the hearts of hard-core consumers and coarsened the consciences of would-be citizens. Clever gimmicks of mass distraction yield a cheap soulcraft of addicted and self-medicated narcissists.
Racism is a moral catastrophe, most graphically seen in the prison industrial complex and targeted police surveillance in black and brown ghettos rendered invisible in public discourse. Arbitrary uses of the law — in the name of the “war” on drugs — have produced, in the legal scholar Michelle Alexander’s apt phrase, a new Jim Crow of mass incarceration. And poverty is an economic catastrophe, inseparable from the power of greedy oligarchs and avaricious plutocrats indifferent to the misery of poor children, elderly citizens and working people.
West ends with nonviolent fighting words:
King’s response to our crisis can be put in one word: revolution. A revolution in our priorities, a re-evaluation of our values, a reinvigoration of our public life and a fundamental transformation of our way of thinking and living that promotes a transfer of power from oligarchs and plutocrats to everyday people and ordinary citizens.
In concrete terms, this means support for progressive politicians like Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont and Mark Ridley-Thomas, a Los Angeles County supervisor; extensive community and media organizing; civil disobedience; and life and death confrontations with the powers that be. Like King, we need to put on our cemetery clothes and be coffin-ready for the next great democratic battle.
Waging Nonviolence is hiring a writer to interview leading movement figures and analysts and produce one Q&A-style article per week. The writer will work with our small editorial team to identify the interview subject each week. For the most part, we’ll be looking to hear from activists, organizers and scholars who can shed light on… More
By melding theory and practice, Philadelphia’s Vanguard S.O.S. are building skills and collective power.
The 1958 voyage of the Golden Rule offers important strategic lessons on how to confront an overwhelming evil and win.
I wish I had the time to do a piece on this – but the memorial is sponsored by BAe Systems, Boeing, and General Electric amongst many other hideous companies. How does it come to this?!
Oh, I wish you would! It’s a difficult question, of course. Someday maybe this will be recognized as a complicated memorial to King himself and to the companies that tried to save themselves from moral ruin—and failed—by associating themselves with him, the relic of a time when American corporations still didn’t have the wherewithal to see their own hypocrisy.
I wanted to encourage you to continue commenting issues as the one you mentioned related to BAe Systems, Boeing, and General Electric being the sponsor of the MLK memorial. Even though you might not be able to write a full length entry, people who read this article will now have a chance to look up the information you mention on their own and get a much better informed view of this topic. I know that personally I would’ve probably never found out about this issue. Again, thank you.
Hi Nathan, I’ve just written an article (ok, a rant) about this since it looks like nobody has the time to write something more considered. I’ve emailed you about it via the contributions web form.