Archive for September 2009

Obama is no FDR, much less Gandhi

crowded_street

Over at Alternet, I have a new piece about Obama’s schizophrenic relationship to protest. Over the years, he has repeatedly pointed to Gandhi as an inspiration. And during Obama’s presidential campaign, he used the perhaps apocryphal story of FDR’s constructive relationship with the grassroots, to urge his supporters who wanted their progressive goals met to go out there and “make me do it.”

Nevertheless, on the eve of the G-20 summit last week, President Barack Obama told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that even during his days as a community organizer in Chicago he was never a big fan of mass protests.

With the clear intention of discouraging those who might join the looming demonstrations against the G-20, Obama explained that he was always a believer that “focusing on concrete, local, immediate issues that have an impact on people’s lives is what really makes a difference; and that having protests about abstractions [such] as global capitalism or something, generally is not really going to make much of a difference.”

I go on to argue that these comments were really disingenuous on Obama’s part for many reasons.

It would not have taken an incredible investigative feat to discover that the protesters descending upon Pittsburgh were doing so for very “concrete” reasons that touch their daily lives in very real ways.

They came to advocate for greater assistance for everyday people during these tough economic times, for more serious government action on global warming ahead of the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, and for an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have already taken such a staggering human and financial toll.

In fact, as a general rule of thumb, most people — whether they are diehard activists or not — don’t normally travel great distances to face ominous riot police firing rubber bullets, pepper spray and deafening sound cannons, unless they have been deeply, personally affected by the issues being protested.

Also, given the surge of right wing protests in recent months, Obama unfortunately missed an important opportunity to encourgage pressure from the left to help forward a more progressive legislative agenda.

Really losing a video game

There are a lot of debates about whether violent video games contribute to causing violence in the world. They do. To remedy that, some have tried to develop nonviolent video games, notably A Force More Powerful, which we have but have yet to try out fully because Jasmine’s PC is so phenomenally slow. Violence in video games is so dangerous, in part, because it misrepresents violence in reality; there is no cost and no real effect.

Now, artist Zach Gage has created Lose/Lose, a simple arcade game that takes a small step toward changing that. When an object in the game gets destroyed, so does an actual file on your computer. Here’s his statement:

Lose/Lose is a video-game with real life consequences. Each alien in the game is created based on a random file on the players computer. If the player kills the alien, the file it is based on is deleted. If the players ship is destroyed, the application itself is deleted.

Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player. This calls into question the player’s mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land?

Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it, that doing so is right?

By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data? What implications does trusting something so important to something we understand so poorly have?

Following Lose/Lose, maybe it’s time for a new rule: violent video games must have violent consequences. I cringe, though, at the thought that people would probably play them anyway, just as they continue to get into real fights.

At the very least, it is time for a real warning on video game packages. Not just the current system of labels which even seem to make a violent game look more enticing, but truly substantive warnings, as on cigarettes. The research exists to support it. Still, that’s pretty pedantic. Do grown-ups really need to be told that they shouldn’t fantasize for hours about going on killing sprees? We should know better.

(h/t Joel Dietz)

Correction: A previous version of this post stated that the game only deletes files internal to itself. Zach Gage wrote in to clarify that, indeed, the game can delete any file on a user’s computer.

Experiments with truth: 9/30/09

  • More than 100 D.C. teenagers from four public high schools walked out of class Monday because they’re angry about impending teacher layoffs recently announced by D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee.
  • Residents living in the Somali police ground at Hamar Jajab district in Mogadishu staged a mass demonstration on Sunday against a statement from the Somali Police department which told them to evacuate the grounds as soon as possible or their makeshifts houses will be destroyed with bulldozers.
  • Zimbabwe police on Friday opened fire on hundreds of striking workers in the southwestern mining town of Zvishavane, injuring four workers including a councillor from Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC party.
  • Workers at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza City, The Khoudhouri College in Tulkarem, Aroub College in Hebron and the Palestinian Technical Institute in Ramallah held a sit-in strike Tuesday, in protest of a failure of the government to respond to requests for improved working conditions.

    Harsh new police tactics on display at G-20

    There seems to have been pretty good coverage of the G-20 protests last week, at least in the alternative press. If you want to read up I would suggest checking out the reports posted on Common Dreams.

    In the meantime, I thought it’d be good to share a few of the more extreme and bizarre videos of the police crackdown from the summit.

    First, and probably the most widely viewed, is the footage of the kidnapping of a protester by men wearing camo. This is really frightening, and reminds me of something you might see under a dictatorship, but not here. Check it out:

    While some questioned its authenticity – probably because it seems so crazy – officials with G-20 security released the following statement regarding the event:

    Military members supporting the G20 Summit work with local law enforcement authorities but do not have the authority to make arrests. The individuals involved in the 9/24/09 arrest which has appeared online are law enforcement officers from a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20. It is not unusual for tactical team members to wear camouflaged fatigues.  The type of fatigues the officers wear designates their unit affiliation.

    Prior to the arrest, the officers observed this subject vandalizing a local business.  Due to the hostile nature of the crowd, officer safety and the safety of the person under arrest, the subject was immediately removed from the area.

    The protester in the video is reportedly still locked up.

    This next video is of the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) being used against protesters. If you don’t know about this latest non-lethal technology, it generates a narrow beam of intense sound that can be physically painful and even permanently damage hearing.

    Read the rest of this article »

    Guinea junta massacres protesters at pro-democracy rally

    OGUINEA_P1In the West African country of Guinea at least 157 people were killed and 1,200 wounded at a protest yesterday, according to the Guinean Organization for Defense of Human Rights. Security forces reeking of alcohol opened fire on 50,000 people who had gathered at the capital’s main soccer stadium for a rally against junta leader Captain Moussa “Dadis” Camara, who took power in a military coup last December. According to the AFP:

    Protestors carried placards reading “No to Dadis” and “Down with the army in power.”

    The junta banned the demonstration, but several political parties, trade unions and civic organisations vowed that the event would go ahead.

    In the middle of the morning, riot police charged the protestors.

    People then scattered in panic as the presidential guard shot into the massive crowd with live ammunition. The AP reports that:

    Eyewitnesses told New York-based Human Rights Watch that security forces stripped female protesters and raped them in the streets. The rights group, citing eyewitness reports, said soldiers on Monday also stabbed protesters with knives and bayonets.

    Not surprisingly, Camara claims that the military was acting out of his control, but the people aren’t buying it. “The killing of all these innocent protesters can only mean doom for his political ambition,” said one local, referring to Camara’s plan to run in elections set for January.

    Unfortunately, the demonstrators were not able to maintain their nonviolent discipline, which inevitably made it easier for the regime and the security forces to justify the violent crack down. Again from the AFP:

    Witnesses said that opposition leaders who tried to reach the stadium were halted by police close to Conakry’s university, where clashes erupted by the end of the morning between riot police and several thousand demonstrators.

    Police reinforcements were rushed to the area, where the protestors were armed with stones and the police with tear gas.

    In Conakry’s working-class Belle-vue district, demonstrators set a police station and a police car ablaze, according to residents.

    Experiments with truth: 09/29/09

    NASA’s top climate scientist explains his turn toward activism

    hansensarrestThere’s a great Q&A with NASA climate scientist Dr. James Hansen in the latest issue of Earth Island Journal in which he addresses his involvement in recent nonviolent direct actions against the coal industry. Some have criticized him heartily for this decision. The New York Times ran a piece back in July questioning whether Hansen still matters because of his recent activities. But the following explanation for his turn toward activism shows he has a far better grasp on the reality of change than his opponents or even his colleagues in Obama’s cabinet—Science Adviser John Holdren and Energy Secretary Steven Chu—for that matter.

    I want to turn to your recent role in some big civil disobedience climate protests: the Capitol climate protest in DC last March, and the protest this past June in West Virginia against mountaintop removal coal mining, where you were arrested for the first time. How did somebody who has worked inside the system for so many years get to a place where you decided that you not only had to be out in a protest but that you were going to get arrested?

    I prefer the phrase “civil resistance” rather than “civil disobedience” for reasons that Gandhi gives.

    When I give a talk on this, I show that the three options for getting the actions that are obviously needed are through the democratic process, influencing the elections of the administration and Congress; secondly, the courts; and then thirdly, civil resistance.

    The first at the top of the list, the democratic process: Well, we’re trying that and you have to continue [trying]. It’s very disappointing that the democratic process ends up with the same old politics, which is exactly what Waxman-Markey is. It does not do the job and it is selling short young people and future generations. And that has gotten to be very frustrating to many people, including me.

    And so, you look at these other things, the courts and civil resistance. The courts: In my talks, I draw attention to the fact that it has long been a basic tenet in our democracy that the current generation is using nature and the property that we have inherited from our parents in what Thomas Jefferson described in his letter to James Madison as “in usufruct.” Meaning that it’s in trust, it’s property that belongs to future generations, and we’re obligated to deliver it in equally good condition as we received it from our preceding generations. Jefferson was thinking especially about the quality of the land and that you can’t degrade the land with agricultural practices that just use up the nutrients and leave nothing for future generations. So that, I think, may provide a basis for the courts coming to the assistance of young people and future generations. But I don’t know how well that will work out.

    So then we arrive at [civil resistance]: I think the point is – just as Gandhi did – to try to draw attention to what is just and what is unjust. It is kind of a last resort, but the problem is we are running out of time. That is what science has made very clear. It is very hard for people to understand this because the magnitude of global warming is so small in comparison to weather fluctuations, and yet what has become clear in the last few years is that it doesn’t take a very large global change in order to have enormous implications in the long run.

    Do you think, then, that more people should start getting involved in civil resistance, in particular when it comes to stopping coal and mountaintop removal mining?

    Yeah. We have got to get Obama to pay attention to this because, as I say, I think he is our best hope. But so far, he seems to be forgetting his obligation to young people.

    Experiments with truth: 9/28/09

    • Thousands of students, faculty members and other employees of the University of California system protested budget cuts Thursday across the state.
    • On Friday, hundreds of people from the town of Na’lin and international activists from Spain, Italy, Britain, Sweden and the United States participated in the weekly nonviolent march to the seperation wall erected by Israel. Eight people were injured by gas canisters shot directly into the crowds and three were arrested.

    Howard Zinn promotes the People’s Summit in Pittsburgh

    Experiments with truth: 9/25/09

    About 300 protesters to attempted to march toward the convention center where the G20 meeting is being held yesterday afternoon, but were met with roaming squads of police officers carrying plastic shields and batons. The police fired a sound cannon that emitted shrill beeps, causing demonstrators to cover their ears and back up, then threw tear gas canisters that released clouds of white smoke and stun grenades that exploded with sharp flashes of light. It is believed this is the first time a sound canon has been used publicly.

    About 300 protesters attempted to march toward the Pittsburgh convention center where the G20 meeting was taking place yesterday afternoon, but were met with roaming squads of police officers carrying plastic shields and batons. The police fired a sound cannon that emitted shrill beeps, causing demonstrators to cover their ears and back up, then threw tear gas canisters that released clouds of white smoke and stun grenades that exploded with sharp flashes of light. It is believed this is the first time a sound canon has been used publicly. About 20 people were arrested.

    • Four Greenpeace activists attached to a massive banner dangled from a Pittsburgh bridge Wednesday to protest the G20 meeting. The 80-by-30-foot sign took the style of a road sign, reading: “Danger: Climate Destruction Ahead. Reduce CO2 emissions now.”
    • Dozens of people gathered in Hamburg, Germany for a flashmob protest of Chancellor Angela Merkel. They yelled an ironic “Yeahh” after every sentence she spoke. The video has become a viral sensation in Germany in the run up to Sunday’s election, with more than 280,000 views so far on YouTube.

    What if environmentalists wrote Star Wars?

    A few years ago environmental activist Derrick Jensen gave a talk in which he imagined how Star Wars might have turned out if it had been written, not by George Lucas, but by a bunch of environmentalists. He called it “Star Non-Violent Civil Disobedience” and described how various pacifist factions would fight over the best way to stop Darth Vader from blowing up the Earth. In doing so, they would never reach a consensus or form a unified resistance movement, which would allow Darth Vader to succeed. But the environmentalists would rejoice because there would be a three-sentence clip in the back pages of The New Empire Times about their efforts.

    The folks at endciv.com—who brought Jensen’s story to life in the above video—say, “The ‘Star Wars’ piece is one of Derrick’s best analogies, one that delivers a precise critique of mainstream environmental groups.”

    I certainly see a lot of truth (and humor) in his criticisms, particularly in regards to lack of organization and disagreement on strategy. But, from what I know of Jensen, he wouldn’t think much of the environmental movement if it were unified and enacting a truly strategic nonviolent campaign.

    If I understand his philosophy correctly, Jensen doesn’t think people can be persuaded to do the right thing—hence his criticism of nonviolence. He favors acts of sabotage, e.g. taking out phone lines and blowing up dams, because he believes they would have more immediate and forceful results.

    I can’t say that I agree with that logic. I’m not aware of any major acts of property destruction that had the effect of reversing a particular injustice. And even if there are some examples, I’m not sure they don’t measure up to the successes nonviolence has attained over the past hundred years.

    But rather than dive further into that debate, I think it’s better to take what good lessons we can from Jensen’s critique of nonviolence, as he certainly makes some legitimate points.

    Experiments with truth: 9/24/09

    UC Davis graduate student Kurt Vaughn, right, joined other minimally clothed students as they protest a plan to raise fees. The rally's goal was to get other students to join in a walkout today, the first day of classes.

    UC Davis graduate student Kurt Vaughn, right, joined other minimally clothed students as they protest a plan to raise fees. The rally's goal was to get other students to join in a walkout today, the first day of classes.

    • The World Bank has announced it will not provide any more loans to oil palm companies until it can guarantee the loans are not causing social and environmental harm. The announcement comes after years of protests by indigenous people and NGOs against the social and environmental destruction caused by oil palm plantations.
    • Moroccan police violently intervened against a peaceful demonstration in Western Sahara calling for the exercising of the Saharawi people’s inalienable right to self-determination, detaining three people and injuring others.
    • Protesting the leasing of land to the Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), the Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) staged a sit-in demonstration on Tuesday in front of the Meghalaya Additional Secretariat.

    Experiments with truth: 9/23/09

    The Mobilization for Climate Justice led a blockade of four lanes of traffic in San Francisco with a parachute-shaped banner that read “Climate Justice or Climate Chaos.” The action was directed against Chevron and the corporate-driven US climate bill.

    The Mobilization for Climate Justice led a blockade of four lanes of traffic in San Francisco with a parachute-shaped banner that read “Climate Justice or Climate Chaos.” The action was directed against Chevron and the corporate-driven US climate bill.

    Faux-bama makes pledge to solve climate crisis

    faux-bama-ilhan-anas-an-indoThe Yes Men aren’t the only ones who can pull off a great prank to raise awareness for climate change. Greenpeace Southeast Asia found an Obama lookalike to give a rousing speech on climate change at the US Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand last weekend. According to Greenpeace, the speech was meant as a “call on world leaders to act on climate change, ahead of the climate session of the United Nations General Assembly” taking place today.

    The 34-year-old Indonesian Faux-bama made the kind of bold statements climate activists have hoped to hear from the American president since he took office:

    Few challenges facing the world are more urgent than combating climate change. Many of you are working to confront this challenge. I am committed to working on this with you.

    I will attend the Copenhagen Climate Summit.

    I will ensure an ambitious, fair and binding global climate treaty.

    I will make funds available for climate mitigation and adaptation, starting with funds to protect the remaining forests.

    This is our chance to build a new future for our children. I will not let this moment pass us by.

    This clever media event is just one of the many Greenpeace Southeast Asia has staged recently to push for dramatic and timely legislation at the UN Climate Summit. It launched a march called The Chang(e) Caravan, which is being led by five rehabilitated Chang elephants.

    The Caravan is traversing Thailand’s Central Plains to tell the story of climate change impacts on communities there, and by doing so increase the pressure on world leaders to act on climate change.

    To learn more about the caravan, check out the Greenpeace Southeast Asia blog. There are a bunch of great pictures of elephants shooting water from their trunks.

    The New York Post goes green for a day

    Activist pranksters The Yes Men have pulled it off again. Yesterday morning as groggy New Yorkers made their morning commute to work they were greeted by a haggle of unconventional newsies slinging a spoof special edition of the New York Post with the front-page headline screaming, “We’re Screwed.”

    Two thousand volunteers helped blanket the city and its boroughs with nearly a million copies of this incredibly authentic-looking parody of the notorious tabloid. The 32-page paper focuses exclusively on climate change with a wide range of articles covering everything from the NYPD’s transition to low-emission cars, to China’s recent push for renewable energy, the failures of the U.S. government to sign onto the Kyoto Potocol (let alone uphold our end of the bargain regarding the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), to even a Page Six item on Pamela Anderson’s new eco and animal-friendly fashion line.

    The timing of the prank was calculated to coincide with today’s UN Summit where one hundred of the world’s leaders will meet to discuss with Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon the crucial steps that are necessary to reduce carbon emissions. The meeting is a prelude to the upcoming Copenhagen climate conference in December, which many experts see as our last chance at drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions and diverting climate disaster.

    While the special edition of the Post is most definitely an amusing hoax on a controversial tabloid and impressive example of creative nonviolent protest, the paper mainly serves as a resounding wake-up call to action. An ad in the paper not only gave readers phone numbers for President Obama, Governor Patterson, and New York senators Gillibrand and Schumer, it even provided talking points to push on the representatives.

    “This could be, and should be, a real New York Post,” said Andy Bichlbaum of the Yes Men in a press release for the action. “Climate change is the biggest threat civilization has ever faced, and it should be in the headlines of every paper, every day until we solve the problem.”

    After last year’s election the Yes Men pulled a similar prank when they handed out over a million copies of a spoof New York Times whose pages were filled with “All the News We Hope to Print,” including a front page headline boasting “Iraq War Over,” stories on Gitmo shutting down, and the passage of a national health insurance act.

    However this time around, all the information contained in the special edition Post was based on actual facts—generating a different reception by readers. Last year when I helped pass out to unknowing victims the fake-Times, the paper had barely left my hands before I was met with a bewildered, “Is this true!?” Today, I passed out an entire stack of papers without being met with a single puzzled look or question regarding the “We’re Screwed” headline. While maybe some eyebrows were raised at the idea of the usually-conservative Post dedicating a slim special edition to discuss the consequences of global warming, it seems that most people are very well aware of our planet’s dire status, and perhaps what was actually printed on the pages of the paper is not really news, but just another reminder of the sad state of affairs of our planet.

    If you don’t live in New York or didn’t get a copy, go to the amazingly well-done New York Post special edition website to read the articles, peruse the ads, and if you’re up for it, check out an incredibly dismal weather report. Or see people’s reactions to the prank on the accompanying video. And most importantly, to get involved go to tcktcktck.org or http://www.beyondtalk.net/.